[tcs-lc] Unnecessary vernacular relationship types?

[Nozomi Ytow]

> [By the
> way....I thought we all agreed that TaxonConcept/Rank was to be eliminated
> in TCS v1.0, since it is unambiguously a property of a NameObject, and not a
> TaxonConcept???? Maybe this is the root of the communication problem we are
> now having!]

Disagree.  We have ranked vernacular names as standard Japanese names
of taxa, and TaxonName (or NameObject still?) is not place for
vernacular names.
--
JMS