[tcs-lc] Re: Question about XML attribute vs. element

[Nozomi Ytow]

> Yes, but this can be accomodated in the urrent TCS as two concept instances
> (one for each Code-name), each having "is congruent to" definitive
> relationship to each other.

I know it, but the expression (two concept for each code-name) confuses
this non-Western, non-native.

> The alternative is to break the 1:1
> Concept:Name design limitation of TCS -- which may be worth considering for
> other reasons as well.

I suspect simply renaming TaxonCocnetp to other is sufficient.


> Agreed, but without breaking the 1:1 Concept:Name design of TCS, they can be
> accomodated in the schema as one name literal, two concepts, two name
> objects.

Then, how many concepts are there, with one definition?
It confuses this non-Western, non-native again...

Cheers,
JMS