[tcs-lc] Poa acroleuca var. ryukyuensis H.Koba & T.Tateoka
Richard Pyle
deepreef at bishopmuseum.org
Wed Mar 9 09:45:41 PST 2005
> I worry that if IPNI is asked a simple question (like what record is
> represented by the record id 965880-1) requiring a single answer,
> then it would only be able to respond with three records (as in your
> example above).
Oh! I thought you *wanted* to render all three names separately. If you
meely want to present "one record" with the important bits, you could
respond with:
<TaxonConcepts>
<TaxonConcept id="IPNI 965880-1" type="Nominal">
<Name type="scientific">
<ScientificName>
<Rank>variety</Rank>
<NameSimple>Poa acroleuca var. ryukyuensis</NameSimple>
<NameComplex>Poa acroleuca var. ryukyuensis H.Koba &
T.Tateoka</NameComplex>
<NameDetailed>
<NomenclaturalCode type="Botanical"/>
<NomenclaturalStatus>Accepted</NomenclaturalStatus>
<CanonicalName>
<Genus>Poa</Genus>
<SpecificEpithet>acroleuca</SpecificEpithet>
<InfraspecificEpithet>ryukyuensis</InfraspecificEpithet>
</CanonicalName>
<CanonicalAuthorship>
<ProtonymAuthorship>
<AuthorSimpleYear>H.Koba & T.Tateoka<AuthorSimpleYear>
<Authors>
<Name>H.Koba</Name>
<Name>T.Tateoka</Name>
<Authors>
</ProtonymAuthorship>
</CanonicalAuthorship>
<FirstPublication>
<PublicationSimple>H.Koba & T.Tateoka [etc...]</PublicationSimple>
<FirstPublication>
</NameDetailed>
</ScientificName>
</Name>
<Relationships type="original species combination">
<ToTaxonConcept ref="cn2"/>
</Relationships>
</TaxonConcept>
</TaxonConcepts>
By the way, did everyone receive the email I sent with the four xsd files
attached, with the subject-line, "Nominal Concepts as bearers of
Nomenclatural information"?
Rich
More information about the Tcs-lc
mailing list